I personally agree with the legal analysis and ultimate decision. The overturning of Wisconsin’s same sex marriage ban has frankly been due a long time. What I disagree with is a decision that concludes without a clear directive to the clerks performing a ministerial duty. It’s no wonder the everyday person gets frustrated by the judiciary. Also, Van Hollen is just simply wrong in telling clerks that the ban remains in effect. On that narrow point, Crabb was clear.